MLB’s recent introduction of sticky stuff checks has stirred up a heated debate among players, coaches, and fans alike, especially after an incident that occurred just this afternoon. In June of 2021, MLB implemented new measures to crack down on the use of illegal/foreign substances by pitchers. Umpires would touch the pitcher’s hands and gloves to check for any substance that could potentially be illegal before or after innings.

Despite the aim of these checks to maintain fairness in the game, they have been criticized for being based on umpires’ subjective opinions on what is illegal and/or too sticky. The lack of clear guidelines has led to confusion and inconsistency in the enforcement of the rule, creating frustration and tension among players who feel that the rule is being unfairly applied.

In this afternoon’s Mets vs Dodgers game, Max Scherzer was ejected following a foreign substance ejection. His agent, Scott Boras, voiced his discontent with the current system, stating that MLB standards and rules enforcement should be more objective and verifiable. Boras stressed that if MLB wants to maintain the integrity of the competition, they need to have clear and precise standards. Otherwise, the game and its players would be damaged. Boras suggested that MLB should employ available scientific methods to create verifiable certainty in its rules, rather than relying on subjective opinions.

Some players argue that the use of sticky stuff can be beneficial for the game when used in moderation. Sticky substances can give pitchers better control over the ball, leading to more strikeouts, more balls in play, and fewer hit-by-pitches. These benefits can make the game more exciting for fans, as it can lead to more strategic pitching and dynamic plays.

However, the use of sticky substances can also give pitchers an unfair advantage, as it can alter the spin and trajectory of the ball, making it more difficult for batters to hit. This can make the game less fair and less enjoyable for both players and fans. MLB has been cracking down on the use of illegal/foreign substances in recent years, and that is why they have implemented the sticky stuff checks.

The current system has also led to increased scrutiny and tension among players and umpires. Pitchers may feel unfairly targeted by the checks, while umpires may feel pressure to enforce the rule more strictly. This can create an atmosphere of suspicion and mistrust, ultimately harming the game and its players. One example of this is when Madison Bumgarner got stared down while getting ejected by an umpire who did not like Bumgarner a few years ago.

In conclusion, the current MLB sticky stuff checks have generated a lot of controversies. While they aim to maintain fairness in the game, their subjective nature and lack of clear guidelines have resulted in confusion and frustration. Some players believe that the use of sticky stuff can be beneficial when used in moderation, while others argue that it gives pitchers an unfair advantage. Ultimately, it is up to the MLB to strike a balance between these competing interests and create a system that promotes fairness, integrity, and excitement in baseball and ensures player safety.